Safe Republican — flipped 2 times in 22 elections
| Group | % |
|---|---|
▶White (Non-Hispanic)(13) | 77.4% |
▶Hispanic / Latino(20) | 12.7% |
▶Black / African American(13) | 0.9% |
▶Asian(6) | 2.3% |
▶Middle Eastern / North African(10) | 0.9% |
▶Native American / Alaska Native(4) | 1.6% |
Multiracial / Other | 5.0% |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $95K |
| Bachelor's or higher | 44.2% |
| English only at home | 79.1% |
| Other language at home | 14.3% |
| Foreign-born | 8.5% |
| Year | Result |
|---|---|
| 2024 | R+24.9 |
| 2020 | R+24.9 |
| 2016 | R+23.9 |
| 2012 | R+60.2 |
| 2008 | R+38.0 |
Utah's 3rd Congressional District is a congressional district that has a population of 821,200. In the 2024 presidential election, it voted Republican with a margin of R+24.9. Akashic Edge tracks 5 presidential elections here, dating back to 2008.
| Year | Dem % | Rep % | Margin | Swing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36.0% | 61.0% | R+24.9 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 35.4% | 60.4% | R+24.9 | R+1.0 |
| 2016 | 23.3% | 47.2% | R+23.9 | D+36.3 |
| 2012 | 19.9% | 80.1% | R+60.2 | R+22.2 |
| 2008 | 29.5% | 67.4% | R+38.0 | — |
It has a moderately diverse, middle-class electorate where education levels and suburban growth shape the partisan balance.
2024 / 2020 precinct vintages
See how each split precinct fragment inside UT-03 voted, swung, and lines up demographically.
Unlock with Pro$33/mo| Group | UT-03 | State | National |
|---|---|---|---|
▶White (Non-Hispanic)(13) | 77.4% | 74.7% | 57.4% |
▶Hispanic / Latino(20) | 12.7% | 15.9% | 19.3% |
Multiracial / Other | 5.0% | 3.8% | 4.0% |
▶Asian(6) | 2.3% | 2.4% | 6.0% |
▶Native American / Alaska Native(4) | 1.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% |
▶Middle Eastern / North African(10) | 0.9% | — | 0.9% |
▶Black / African American(13) | 0.9% | 1.2% | 12.2% |
44% of adults hold a bachelor's degree — 11pp above the national average. Places with similar education levels vote D+16 on average nationally.
Scale, voting-age share, and this geography's footprint inside the national electorate.
Income, attainment, and ownership indicators that often shape coalition structure and turnout behavior.
Age structure, language use, and nativity signals that explain how this geography differs from state and nation.
| Offices | Margin A | Margin B | Split |
|---|---|---|---|
| President vs House | R+24.9 | R+32.8 | 7.8pp |