
Safe Republican — flipped 4 times in 25 elections
| Group | % |
|---|---|
▶White (Non-Hispanic)(13) | 88.1% |
▶Hispanic / Latino(18) | 4.1% |
▶Black / African American(8) | 2.4% |
▶Asian(6) | 1.4% |
▶Middle Eastern / North African(11) | 2.4% |
▶Native American / Alaska Native(1) | 0.2% |
Multiracial / Other | 3.8% |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Median household income | $85K |
| Bachelor's or higher | 29.2% |
| English only at home | 89.5% |
| Other language at home | 5.6% |
| Foreign-born | 4.1% |
| Year | Result |
|---|---|
| 2024 | R+13.5 |
| 2020 | R+29.4 |
| 2016 | R+13.6 |
| 2012 | R+0.1 |
| 2008 | D+6.3 |
Michigan's 9th Congressional District is a congressional district that has a population of 778,989. In the 2024 presidential election, it voted Republican with a margin of R+13.5. Akashic Edge tracks 5 presidential elections here, dating back to 2008.
| Year | Dem % | Rep % | Margin | Swing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42.3% | 55.8% | R+13.5 | D+15.9 |
| 2020 | 34.6% | 64.0% | R+29.4 | R+15.8 |
| 2016 | 40.8% | 54.4% | R+13.6 | R+13.5 |
| 2012 | 50.0% | 50.0% | R+0.1 | R+6.3 |
| 2008 | 52.1% | 45.9% | D+6.3 | — |
MI-09 is a solidly Republican urban geography that has voted Republican in every presidential election since 2012. It shifted 15.9pp toward Democrats between 2020 and 2024. Its 779K residents are moderately educated (29% hold a bachelor's degree).
2024 precinct vintages
See how each split precinct fragment inside MI-09 voted, swung, and lines up demographically.
Unlock with Pro$33/moContinue the similarity set with additional districts matched on demographics, presidential behavior, and House profile.
| Group | MI-09 | State | National |
|---|---|---|---|
▶White (Non-Hispanic)(13) | 88.1% | 72.4% | 57.4% |
▶Hispanic / Latino(18) | 4.1% | 5.9% | 19.3% |
Multiracial / Other | 3.8% | 4.6% | 4.0% |
▶Middle Eastern / North African(11) | 2.4% | — | 0.9% |
▶Black / African American(8) | 2.4% | 13.3% | 12.2% |
▶Asian(6) | 1.4% | 3.4% | 6.0% |
▶Native American / Alaska Native(1) | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% |
Scale, voting-age share, and this geography's footprint inside the national electorate.
Income, attainment, and ownership indicators that often shape coalition structure and turnout behavior.
Age structure, language use, and nativity signals that explain how this geography differs from state and nation.
| Offices | Margin A | Margin B | Split |
|---|---|---|---|
| President vs House | R+13.5 | R+37.3 | 23.7pp |